: I'd like to say first that I fully understand your
: expansion and find it both original and intriguing.
: You've made it a "good" war, wherein both
: sides fight for their right to exist, and not the
: usual "You're totally right and they're totally
: wrong; you have every right to blast them and they
: don't" kind of thing.
: But that applies only to your expansion. Unfortunately,
: the Bungie Myth isn't as original as your idea. Even
: despite my opinion that the Bungie Myth remains
: intriguing despite the lack of its plot's originality.
: Anyway, what I'm attempting to explain is that when I say
: and defend stuff like 'the Leveler is evil and wrong'
: and 'the ghols are evil, Myrks are evil' etc. etc.,
: I'm referring to Bungie's Myth. In Forrest's Myth it
: is an entirely different story, of course. But I'd
: never be able to debate in Forrest's Myth, which is
: why my arguments always refer to Bungie's Myth, and
: not MJ's Myth, Seabolt's Myth etc.
: As to exactly why I couldn't debate Forrest's Myth, I
: think it's simply because I'm not 1337 enough :) :
: nudge : : wink :
: I'd give that a 10 on my zaniness factor. : nudge :
: -Welly
I really don't think I should post on this, since my firery Celtic temper might act up again, but I'm going to try and keep it under control.
My standard of right and wrong is based on actions, and to the very best of our knowledge, the so called "Dark" is actually evil. Certainly the pyschopathic Soulblighter's got problems.
Not going into detail here, will if anyone wants it.
Seraph
