Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
None of that is really the driving thing either, at least to me. They had a story about her dying. They had her acknowledge and accept that it was happening, that her life was ending. They showed her die in as clear a way as they could-- she deteriorated and the machinery she was in was destroyed. This all had an emotional weight to it. Having a way out of the situation, even a believable one, doesn't change the fact that we the audience saw her die, and that was the intended take-away, and there were no caveats or exceptions or ways out presented. To undo that would render that story moot. True, that wouldn't make it a worse story in and of itself, and it wouldn't necessarily mean the Chief can't change and grow because that happened, but it would take away a lot of the weight of context, and it would make it feel less purposeful, and it would set a bad precedent.
In other words, any way they bring back the Cortana we know would be "some kind of retcon or tricky wording or change or direction or whatever". I know you're fond of the idea that anything is possible with an AI, but this was explicitly stated to not be possible. To go back on that is to (at least in some way) lie to the audience, and that can work in some cases, but I don't feel this is one of them.