: This all sounds correct and reasonable to me, except that the S-IIIs were
: still quite young when they were "recruited", not teenagers yet
: from what I remember, and this part that sticks out: The question then is,
: why is it so important to you and others that this character type, a
: person that's more heavily broken down or stunted and built into a
: business-oriented soldier, is applied to everyone that has the label
: "Spartan", even if there are justifiable reasons for them to act
: differently? or, if it's not that specific, why does this new character
: type bother you guys so much?

It's one of those ""to each their own"kind of arguments, GV.

There is no right or wrong way to portray them, it's the fact some won't care, while some do.

I like what was established and see no reason it needs to change, to be like other modern shooters (in relation to how characters are handled) because that's always come first for me in what sets Halo apart from a sea of mediocrity.

These days, Destiny, Halo, the rest, they all blur together for me and that never used to be the case.