Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
: In fairness, the section you're quoting was written in 2006. As an admin of
: the current Halopedia, we split from them a while ago, and while I can't
: speak for anyone else, I've found the lower traffic has been a quality
: control blessing. I remember solid days spent rolling back vandalism and
: poor edits in the leadup to and aftermath of I think Reach (or at least it
: feels that way now) but these days, we maintain a smaller, less casual
: community of contributors that mean higher-quality edits on average and
: far less vandalism and better response time to it.
The Halopedia article is MUCH better.
halo.wikia article on reclaimer is V poor | scarab | 12/2/15 4:44 pm |
That's why you should use Halopedia. | Quirel | 12/2/15 5:12 pm |
Re: halo.wikia article on reclaimer is V poor | Morhek | 12/2/15 5:59 pm |
oddly enough I was thinking 2006 | scarab | 12/3/15 1:21 am |
Re: oddly enough I was thinking 2006 | Morhek | 12/3/15 3:07 am |
Halopedia > Halo Wiki. That is all. *NM* | Gravemind | 12/2/15 6:45 pm |
^ This x100000 *NM* | zofinda | 12/2/15 7:37 pm |