: I only caught the end of that discussion, but the general
: concenses seemed to be that A-It was the original mazz
: but so tightly bound to the Watcher that he could do
: nothing about his state or B-It was not the real mazz
: and was simply named after him for some reason or
: another.
: Anyone want to beat me over the head and explain it
: better?
Given what we know, there's not much else it could be. Either it's not the same Mazzarin (which is basically closest we could get to calling it a mistake), or Mazzarin was an exceptional case who for some reason was Shadified against his will and (probably) after he was dead, although in general Shades cannot or are not made this way.
--SiliconDream
