Re: NO WOMEN---why?

Posted By: SiliconDream =PN= (as3-2-36.HIP.Berkeley.EDU)
Date: 2/16/2001 at 2:27 a.m.

In Response To: Re: NO WOMEN---why? (DingoAteMyBaby)

: Assuming Mauls similarities extend a little farther than
: looks I think the tusks are a dead giveaway. I may be
: mistaken but arn't tusks more prominent on male boars?
: If so I beleive they're used to fight over female
: boars so it makes sense that male mauls would have
: them.

Good point. As it happens, GURPS includes tusks in the basic gender-neutral Maul template (they're worth mentioning because they protect the Maul's face somewhat), so I guess officially they belong to both genders. But more prominent and ornate tusks would definitely seem appropriate.

I really really like Mauls, for some reason. Mauls and Ghôls. They're probably the most interesting races in Myth to me. Not sure why. But you needed to know that.

--SiliconDream

Messages In This Thread

• NO WOMEN---why?
  necrolyte (c1355442-a.palto1.sfba.home.com) -- 2/15/2001 at 12:15 a.m.
  • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
    SiliconDream =PN= (as3-2-155.HIP.Berkeley.EDU) -- 2/15/2001 at 2:06 a.m.
    • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
      David Bricker (162.129.225.141) -- 2/15/2001 at 8:44 a.m.
      • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
        SiliconDream =PN= (as3-1-39.HIP.Berkeley.EDU) -- 2/15/2001 at 9:52 a.m.
        • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
          David Bricker (162.129.225.141) -- 2/15/2001 at 10:24 a.m.
          • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
            Smasher (crystal62.csus.com) -- 2/15/2001 at 2:39 p.m.
            • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
              Archer »–)› (dial429.p.early.com) -- 2/15/2001 at 5:14 p.m.
          • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
            SiliconDream =PN= (as3-2-96.HIP.Berkeley.EDU) -- 2/15/2001 at 8:49 p.m.
            • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
              DingoAteMyBaby (cx814033-a.tulsa1.ok.home.com) -- 2/15/2001 at 10:53 p.m.
              • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
                SiliconDream =PN= (as3-2-36.HIP.Berkeley.EDU) -- 2/16/2001 at 2:27 a.m.
                • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
                  Discordia (cx312661-a.santab1.ca.home.com) -- 2/16/2001 at 12:04 p.m.
                  • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
                    Welly (spider-wg054.proxy.aol.com) -- 2/16/2001 at 5:37 p.m.
                    • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
                      Discordia (cx312661-a.santab1.ca.home.com) -- 2/16/2001 at 6:04 p.m.
                      • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
                        SiliconDream =PN= (as3-2-24.HIP.Berkeley.EDU) -- 2/16/2001 at 9:05 p.m.
        • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
          Ares™ (adsl-78-132-152.btr.bellsouth.net) -- 2/15/2001 at 8:44 p.m.
          • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
            SiliconDream =PN= (as3-2-36.HIP.Berkeley.EDU) -- 2/16/2001 at 2:20 a.m.
    • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
      DingoAteMyBaby (cx814033-a.tulsa1.ok.home.com) -- 2/15/2001 at 5:42 p.m.
      • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
        SiliconDream =PN= (as3-2-96.HIP.Berkeley.EDU) -- 2/15/2001 at 8:41 p.m.
        • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
          DingoAteMyBaby (cx814033-a.tulsa1.ok.home.com) -- 2/15/2001 at 10:49 p.m.
          • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
            Thoth (ts5m-pool0-230.gti.net) -- 2/16/2001 at 1:28 a.m.
            • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
              Discordia (cx312661-a.santab1.ca.home.com) -- 2/16/2001 at 12:11 p.m.
              • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
                DingoAteMyBaby (cx814033-a.tulsa1.ok.home.com) -- 2/16/2001 at 12:41 p.m.
                • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
                  Thoth (ts5m-pool0-177.gti.net) -- 2/16/2001 at 3:09 p.m.
                  • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
                    Discordia (cx312661-a.santab1.ca.home.com) -- 2/16/2001 at 4:58 p.m.
                    • Myrks
                      Welly (spider-wg054.proxy.aol.com) -- 2/16/2001 at 5:29 p.m.
                      • Re: Myrks
                        Discordia (cx312661-a.santab1.ca.home.com) -- 2/16/2001 at 6:19 p.m.
                        • Re: Myrks
                          Welly (spider-wo041.proxy.aol.com) -- 2/16/2001 at 8:39 p.m.
                    • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
                      necrolyte (c1355442-a.palto1.sfba.home.com) -- 2/16/2001 at 6:14 p.m.
                      • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
                        Discordia (cx312661-a.santab1.ca.home.com) -- 2/16/2001 at 6:22 p.m.
                      • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
                        DingoAteMyBaby (cx814033-a.tulsa1.ok.home.com) -- 2/16/2001 at 7:52 p.m.
                        • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
                          SiliconDream =PN= (as3-2-24.HIP.Berkeley.EDU) -- 2/16/2001 at 9:00 p.m.
                    • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
                      Thoth (ts6m-pool0-117.gti.net) -- 2/16/2001 at 9:38 p.m.
    • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
      necrolyte (c1355442-a.palto1.sfba.home.com) -- 2/16/2001 at 5:59 p.m.
      • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
        DingoAteMyBaby (cx814033-a.tulsa1.ok.home.com) -- 2/16/2001 at 7:40 p.m.
    • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
      Rincewind MoG (AC922AF4.ipt.aol.com) -- 2/18/2001 at 2:56 p.m.
      • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
        Ares™ (adsl-78-132-152.btr.bellsouth.net) -- 2/18/2001 at 3:12 p.m.
        • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
          Rincewind MoG (AC922AF4.ipt.aol.com) -- 2/18/2001 at 3:43 p.m.
        • Re: NO WOMEN---why?
          Discordia (cx312661-a.santab1.ca.home.com) -- 2/18/2001 at 4:05 p.m.
        • ...more women units
          Welly (spider-wi052.proxy.aol.com) -- 2/19/2001 at 4:26 p.m.
          • Re: ...more women units
            Archer »–)› (dial475.p.early.com) -- 2/19/2001 at 6:08 p.m.
            • Find em here...
              Welly (spider-tj054.proxy.aol.com) -- 2/19/2001 at 10:32 p.m.
  • Welly comes to and remembers the female zerks
    Welly (spider-tr083.proxy.aol.com) -- 2/15/2001 at 8:40 p.m.
    • ...Wait, there's more
      Welly (spider-tr083.proxy.aol.com) -- 2/15/2001 at 9:05 p.m.

For your own future enjoyment, please report any major forum abusers or cgi errors so we can remedy the problem. If you have any questions email us.

The Asylum

The Asylum is maintained by Myth Admin with WebBBS 5.12.