Re: ok here is a theory.. GOOD ONE

Posted By: Forrest of B.org (term2-18.vta.west.net)
Date: 2/14/2001 at 9:59 p.m.

In Response To: Re: ok here is a theory.. GOOD ONE (MWA Pfhor)

: Yeah, Moagim reborn was born in 1431, but NOT Connacht!
: Connacht was born like 30 years or so before, in the
: early 1400s. He was born In The Wind Age, yeah,
: really! :)

Well, obviously neither of them were BORN then. I should have said "arose". Moagim Reborn was still reborn like anyone else, not just some magic "poof! I'm alive again!" thing (at least, as far as we know). They were both born sometime before, and their clash climaxed in 1431.

Messages In This Thread

• ok here is a theory.. GOOD ONE
  necrolyte (c1355442-a.palto1.sfba.home.com) -- 2/13/2001 at 11:43 p.m.
  • Re: ok here is a theory.. GOOD ONE
    Forrest of B.org (term1-16.vta.west.net) -- 2/13/2001 at 11:49 p.m.
    • Re: ok here is a theory.. GOOD ONE
      MWA Pfhor (pool0381.cvx20-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net) -- 2/14/2001 at 9:45 p.m.
      • Re: ok here is a theory.. GOOD ONE
        Forrest of B.org (term2-18.vta.west.net) -- 2/14/2001 at 9:59 p.m.
        • Re: ok here is a theory.. GOOD ONE
          necrolyte (c1355442-a.palto1.sfba.home.com) -- 2/15/2001 at 12:01 a.m.
          • Re: ok here is a theory.. GOOD ONE
            SiliconDream =PN= (as3-1-172.HIP.Berkeley.EDU) -- 2/15/2001 at 12:23 a.m.
            • Re: ok here is a theory.. GOOD ONE
              Archer »–)ð (dial429.p.early.com) -- 2/15/2001 at 4:35 p.m.
        • Re: ok here is a theory.. GOOD ONE
          MWA Pfhor (sji-ca-cache2.icg.net) -- 2/15/2001 at 2:24 p.m.

For your own future enjoyment, please report any major forum abusers or cgi errors so we can remedy the problem. If you have any questions email us.

The Asylum

The Asylum is maintained by Myth Admin with WebBBS 5.12.