Re: OK, here's my point...

Posted By: Dan Rudolph (helser-1028.res.iastate.edu)
Date: 10/29/1999 at 4:50 p.m.

In Response To: OK, here's my point... (joyeuse)

: The Ghols are too stupid to ally with the light usually,
: since the light has killed so many of their number,
: plus they are generally tricked by dark sorceries.

There haven't been any dark sorceries for awhile and the light killed them a long time ago. The fir'Bolg were enemies of the light, then allied with them. If the ghols didn't go light, they would have died.

: Well. I can't find any tangible evidence that Chimera is
: being worked on at all. I have an old Bungievision
: newsletter, but I can't find a website, or get a
: response from bungie on the subject.

The Chimera team was in Bungie's company picnic photos. Myth: Total Codex ships November 15 (2nd anniversary of TFL) and includes Chimera. One would assume they will have it done and available around then.

Messages In This Thread

• To the whole forum!
  Joyeuse (ptp92.kctc.net) -- 10/26/1999 at 10:44 a.m.
  • Re: To the whole forum!
    duckyjo (ryanlinn.gould.pvt.k12.me.us) -- 10/26/1999 at 11:37 a.m.
    • Re: To the whole forum!
      William Wallace (cache-1.server.telinco.net) -- 10/26/1999 at 1:18 p.m.
      • Re: To the whole forum!
        Blackhand (arc1a148.bf.sover.net) -- 10/26/1999 at 2:40 p.m.
        • A sugestion
          Drunken Ghol (pm24m.icx.net) -- 10/26/1999 at 3:54 p.m.
          • Re: A sugestion
            joyeuse (ptp57.kctc.net) -- 10/27/1999 at 5:43 a.m.
            • Re: A sugestion
              nobody (206.244.76.126) -- 10/28/1999 at 3:48 a.m.
              • Re: A sugestion
                Drunken Ghol (pm15at.icx.net) -- 10/28/1999 at 10:56 a.m.
                • Re: A sugestion
                  duckyjo (ryanlinn.gould.pvt.k12.me.us) -- 10/28/1999 at 12:23 p.m.
                  • Re: A sugestion
                    SiliconDream (anton-mates.hip.berkeley.edu) -- 10/28/1999 at 9:49 p.m.
                    • Re: A sugestion
                      Forrest (cache3.avtel.net) -- 10/28/1999 at 11:39 p.m.
                      • Re: A sugestion
                        Sigma (ip232.dayton5.oh.pub-ip.psi.net) -- 10/29/1999 at 4:43 a.m.
                        • Re: A sugestion
                          Surt With One Eye (host103-049.chillicothe.lib.oh.us) -- 10/29/1999 at 8:28 a.m.
                        • Re: A sugestion
                          Smeagol (spider-we031.proxy.aol.com) -- 10/29/1999 at 9:47 a.m.
                        • Re: A sugestion
                          Milk Man (ip224.herndon29.va.pub-ip.psi.net) -- 10/29/1999 at 10:07 a.m.
                          • Re: A sugestion
                            Forrest (cache3.avtel.net) -- 10/29/1999 at 10:22 a.m.
                            • Re: A sugestion
                              SiliconDream (anton-mates.hip.berkeley.edu) -- 10/29/1999 at 4:32 p.m.
                      • Final Intallment (revised)
                        Milk Man (ip172.herndon24.va.pub-ip.psi.net) -- 10/29/1999 at 10:23 a.m.
                      • Re: A sugestion
                        Dan Rudolph (friley-910.res.iastate.edu) -- 10/29/1999 at 1:26 p.m.
                        • Re: A sugestion
                          nobody (206.244.76.228) -- 10/30/1999 at 3:08 a.m.
                          • Re: A sugestion
                            Dan Rudolph (helser-1028.res.iastate.edu) -- 10/30/1999 at 11:18 a.m.
                      • Sounds A little Like...
                        neomorpheous (1cust228.tnt1.iowa-city.ia.da.uu.net) -- 10/29/1999 at 1:49 p.m.
                    • I Think The Man Has A Point...
                      neomorpheous (1cust228.tnt1.iowa-city.ia.da.uu.net) -- 10/29/1999 at 1:28 p.m.
                    • Re: A sugestion
                      joyeuse (ptp72.kctc.net) -- 10/29/1999 at 1:39 p.m.
                      • Re: A sugestion
                        SiliconDream (anton-mates.hip.berkeley.edu) -- 10/29/1999 at 4:29 p.m.
      • Re: tolkien
        duckyjo (ryanlinn.gould.pvt.k12.me.us) -- 10/26/1999 at 3:12 p.m.
    • Re: To the whole forum!
      joyeuse (ptp106.kctc.net) -- 10/26/1999 at 1:25 p.m.
    • Re: To the whole forum!
      Forrest (cache3.avtel.net) -- 10/26/1999 at 6:07 p.m.
      • Re: To the whole forum!
        duckyjo (ryanlinn.gould.pvt.k12.me.us) -- 10/27/1999 at 1:53 a.m.
        • Creation's official status...
          Pimpy (sdn-ar-001ilchicp023.dialsprint.net) -- 10/28/1999 at 11:49 a.m.
          • A note on the release...
            Ares (host-216-77-202-39.btr.bellsouth.net) -- 10/30/1999 at 2:07 p.m.
          • A note on the release...
            Ares (host-216-77-202-39.btr.bellsouth.net) -- 10/30/1999 at 2:10 p.m.
  • Re: To the whole forum!
    Dan Rudolph (helser-1028.res.iastate.edu) -- 10/26/1999 at 8:50 p.m.
    • Re: To the whole forum!
      joyeuse (ptp57.kctc.net) -- 10/27/1999 at 5:33 a.m.
      • Re: To the whole forum!
        Dan Rudolph (helser-1028.res.iastate.edu) -- 10/27/1999 at 12:15 p.m.
        • Re: To the whole forum!
          joyeuse (ptp56.kctc.net) -- 10/28/1999 at 7:09 a.m.
  • Sugestions and Critisisms...
    Milk Man (ip5.herndon24.va.pub-ip.psi.net) -- 10/28/1999 at 4:12 p.m.
    • OK, here's my point...
      joyeuse (ptp72.kctc.net) -- 10/29/1999 at 1:03 p.m.
      • Re: OK, here's my point...
        Milk Man (ip169.herndon29.va.pub-ip.psi.net) -- 10/29/1999 at 3:41 p.m.
      • Re: OK, here's my point...
        Dan Rudolph (helser-1028.res.iastate.edu) -- 10/29/1999 at 4:50 p.m.
      • Re: OK, here's my point...
        Dan Rudolph (helser-1028.res.iastate.edu) -- 10/29/1999 at 4:52 p.m.
  • OK, read this now, all of you!
    joyeuse (ptp72.kctc.net) -- 10/29/1999 at 2:14 p.m.
    • An old probably dead thread.
      Seraph (adsl-66-120-162-73.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) -- 8/5/2002 at 12:17 a.m.
      • Re: An old probably dead thread.
        Forrest of B.org (term2-44.vta.west.net) -- 8/5/2002 at 1:05 a.m.
        • Re: An old probably dead thread.
          Seraph (adsl-66-120-162-73.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) -- 8/5/2002 at 2:11 a.m.
          • Re: An old probably dead thread.
            Forrest of B.org (term2-44.vta.west.net) -- 8/5/2002 at 2:31 a.m.
            • Re: An old probably dead thread.
              Seraph (adsl-66-120-162-73.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) -- 8/5/2002 at 2:46 a.m.
              • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                Forrest of B.org (205.254.241.95) -- 8/6/2002 at 2:49 a.m.
            • Re: An old probably dead thread.
              kalamadea MIA (h002078cfad1c.ne.client2.attbi.com) -- 8/5/2002 at 3:23 a.m.
              • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                Seraph (adsl-66-120-162-73.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) -- 8/5/2002 at 3:47 a.m.
                • Re: An old probably dead thread. *PIC*
                  Iron Duke (zepher.lnk.telstra.net) -- 8/5/2002 at 4:11 a.m.
                  • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                    Seraph (adsl-66-120-162-73.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) -- 8/5/2002 at 5:13 a.m.
                  • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                    Forrest of B.org (205.254.241.95) -- 8/6/2002 at 3:36 a.m.
                    • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                      Seraph (adsl-66-120-162-73.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) -- 8/6/2002 at 3:53 p.m.
                      • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                        Forrest of B.org (68.6.118.241) -- 8/6/2002 at 8:03 p.m.
                        • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                          Seraph (adsl-66-120-162-73.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) -- 8/6/2002 at 8:12 p.m.
                          • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                            Forrest of B.org (term2-25.vta.west.net) -- 8/7/2002 at 3:16 a.m.
                            • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                              Seraph (adsl-66-123-170-25.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) -- 8/7/2002 at 4:24 a.m.
                      • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                        Martel (213.104.87.168) -- 8/6/2002 at 8:24 p.m.
                        • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                          Seraph (adsl-66-120-162-73.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) -- 8/6/2002 at 8:28 p.m.
                          • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                            Martel (inktomi2-nth.server.ntl.com) -- 8/7/2002 at 10:37 a.m.
                            • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                              Seraph (adsl-66-123-170-25.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) -- 8/7/2002 at 12:37 p.m.
                              • Re: An old probably dead thread. *PIC*
                                zeph (194.125.156.232) -- 8/7/2002 at 2:27 p.m.
                                • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                                  Seraph (adsl-64-171-5-220.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) -- 8/7/2002 at 2:56 p.m.
                    • Let me see if I have this straight...
                      Zandervix (spider-ntc-tb072.proxy.aol.com) -- 8/7/2002 at 1:45 p.m.
            • Re: An old probably dead thread. *PIC*
              zeph (194.125.156.177) -- 8/5/2002 at 10:07 a.m.
              • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                Seraph (adsl-66-120-162-73.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) -- 8/5/2002 at 1:39 p.m.
                • Re: An old probably dead thread. *PIC*
                  zeph (194.125.156.65) -- 8/5/2002 at 4:32 p.m.
                  • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                    Seraph (adsl-66-120-162-73.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) -- 8/5/2002 at 4:45 p.m.
                    • Re: An old probably dead thread. *PIC*
                      zeph (194.125.156.103) -- 8/5/2002 at 7:16 p.m.
                      • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                        Seraph (adsl-66-120-162-73.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) -- 8/5/2002 at 7:31 p.m.
                        • Re: An old probably dead thread. *PIC*
                          zeph (194.125.156.21) -- 8/6/2002 at 5:10 p.m.
                          • Re: An old probably dead thread. *PIC*
                            Welly (spider-ta041.proxy.aol.com) -- 8/7/2002 at 12:23 a.m.
                            • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                              Seraph (adsl-66-123-170-25.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) -- 8/7/2002 at 12:39 a.m.
                            • Re: An old probably dead thread. *PIC*
                              zeph (194.125.156.232) -- 8/7/2002 at 2:19 p.m.
                              • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                                Seraph (adsl-64-171-5-220.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) -- 8/7/2002 at 2:58 p.m.
                              • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                                Welly (spider-ta081.proxy.aol.com) -- 8/7/2002 at 5:02 p.m.
                                • Re: An old probably dead thread. *PIC*
                                  zeph (194.125.156.95) -- 8/7/2002 at 5:17 p.m.
                                  • Re: An old probably dead thread.
                                    Seraph (adsl-66-123-169-131.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) -- 8/7/2002 at 6:50 p.m.
      • Re: An old probably dead thread.
        Joyeuse (208.129.184.26) -- 8/5/2002 at 2:40 p.m.
        • Re: An old probably dead thread.
          Seraph (adsl-66-120-162-73.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) -- 8/5/2002 at 3:01 p.m.
          • Re: An old probably dead thread.
            Joyeuse (208.129.184.26) -- 8/5/2002 at 3:08 p.m.
            • Re: An old probably dead thread.
              Seraph (adsl-66-120-162-73.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net) -- 8/5/2002 at 3:17 p.m.

For your own future enjoyment, please report any major forum abusers or cgi errors so we can remedy the problem. If you have any questions email us.

The Asylum

The Asylum is maintained by Myth Admin with WebBBS 5.12.