 |
Re: good point, but...
Posted By: SiliconDream =PN= (as3-2-117.HIP.Berkeley.EDU)
Date: 5/3/2000 at 9:57 p.m.
In Response To: good point, but... (duckyjo)
: If it was in invincible armor, wouldn't it be able to
: resist the explosion? maybe, maybe not. hmmm.
Yeah, well, hyperbole's big in Myth. Soublighter thought he was unkillable until he lost a chunk of his being, got whaled on with a lightning-spewing magical broadsword, and was dropped in a pit of molten lava. Besides, IIRC the armor itself was never called invincible or unbreakable or anything like that; rather, it was said to render *the wearer* invulnerable. And that (assuming Balor's armor was that particular model) was already disproved.
--SiliconDream
Messages In This Thread
- Balors Body
DarkSword (pppte13-01.ght.airmail.net) -- 5/3/2000 at 3:14 a.m.
- Re: Balors Body
Stinger (d185d180a.rochester.rr.com) -- 5/3/2000 at 7:06 p.m.
- Re: Balors Body
duckyjo (ryanlinn.gould.pvt.k12.me.us) -- 5/3/2000 at 7:16 p.m.
- Re: Balors Body
SiliconDream =PN= (as3-1-24.HIP.Berkeley.EDU) -- 5/3/2000 at 7:36 p.m.
- good point, but...
duckyjo (ryanlinn.gould.pvt.k12.me.us) -- 5/3/2000 at 8:26 p.m.
- Re: good point, but...
SiliconDream =PN= (as3-2-117.HIP.Berkeley.EDU) -- 5/3/2000 at 9:57 p.m.
- Re: good point, but...
David Wellington (dialup-63.211.241.139.Denver1.Level3.net) -- 5/4/2000 at 10:31 a.m.
- The Last Word
Forrest (at Work) (adsl-216-102-237-28.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net) -- 5/4/2000 at 12:10 p.m.
- Re: The Last Word
soulblader (sdn-ar-008nynyorP077.dialsprint.net) -- 5/4/2000 at 3:28 p.m.
- Re: The Last Word
Forrest (at Work) (adsl-216-102-237-28.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net) -- 5/4/2000 at 4:30 p.m.
- Re: The Last Word
soulblader (sdn-ar-002nynyorP276.dialsprint.net) -- 5/4/2000 at 8:19 p.m.
- Ahhh...
Stinger (d185d180a.rochester.rr.com) -- 5/3/2000 at 7:39 p.m.
For your own future enjoyment, please report any major forum abusers or cgi errors so we can remedy the problem. If you have any questions email us.
| The Asylum |
|
|
