: Except there is no valid interpretation that can resolve
: the inconsistency. Dan makes use of incorrect
: definitions of the word Reclaim and tries to say that
: they talk about two different points in time (not only
: are we talking about spans, not points, but the time
: spans overlap a great deal). Neither of these
: arguments makes sense or is in any way, shape, or form
: correct.
I think regardless of what the real meaning of reclaim is, Bungie meant the same thing I argued, otherwise, things don't make sense.
I think the problem here is the definition of posession. If something is yours by birthright, you can consider it yours, in the sense that it's your right, not your posession necessarily. In this context, you could argue that Alric was not exactly the throne, but his right to it, and sentence is slightly metaphorical.
