Forums Loading, stand by... HOME

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

Re: My proplem concerning Gurps Timeline

Posted By: William Wallace (ppp-1-222.cvx2.telinco.net)
Date: 1/13/2000 at 9:30 a.m.

In Response To: My proplem concerning Gurps Timeline (Killing duck)

: Here is my problem with the Myth GURPS theori i have to
: problems.

: 1. i dont belive that Balor isn't the leveller, Alric
: said so and i belive Alric not GURPS, because Bungie
: decided what Alric should, say yes and i know that
: Bungie intintion could be that Alric was wrong but i
: consider that very unlikely.

Your mistake is to make a distinction between the reliability of GURPS and the reliability of Bungie. They are exactly the same in that way. Anyway, GURPS doesn't set it in slate that Balor isn't the Leveller, it merely says that he might not be.

: 2.Moagim and the Myrkridia, i dont belive that Moagim was
: killed before he fighted against Balor, and i dont
: belive in any Moagim reborn ( i dont evwen know who he
: is)

Moagim never fought Balor, what are you talking about? Moagim Reborn is a name given to the Leveller that Connacht killed during the Wind Age. Knowone knows his true name but some call him Moagim Reborn. That's a fact.

: and by the way the Gurps theori remains me of my first
: theori that had 5 ages wit a leveller in the end of
: every age, and then a hero in the new age that
: defeated the leveller of the old.

That's also the theory that almost everyone else had.

Messages In This Thread

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

For your own future enjoyment, please report any major forum abusers or cgi errors so we can remedy the problem. If you have any questions email us.

The Asylum

The Asylum is maintained by Myth Admin with WebBBS 5.12.