Forums Loading, stand by... HOME

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

Re: A question about GURPS Myth

Posted By: sigma (ip202.dayton5.oh.pub-ip.psi.net)
Date: 12/29/1999 at 2:44 p.m.

In Response To: Re: A question about GURPS Myth (Dan Rudolph)

: It also says the cult was human, which means we were
: wrong.

: Where does it say that? It talks about the sacking in
: several places, but all it says is that they lost the
: emperor. Prsumably, this means he died. It nowhere
: says that Connacht was still considered the emperor.

Well, i was just speculating at this point, the people of the Empire said that Connacht left his throne and was never known to have died. There may have been other people who held the position, but i was always under the impression that one must die before a successor can be named.

Then again, the people sitting on the throne may have been just keeping Connacht's seat warm until he came back.

Messages In This Thread

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

For your own future enjoyment, please report any major forum abusers or cgi errors so we can remedy the problem. If you have any questions email us.

The Asylum

The Asylum is maintained by Myth Admin with WebBBS 5.12.