 |
Re: A question about GURPS Myth
Posted By: David Wellington (dialup-209.244.78.210.Denver1.Level3.net)
Date: 12/29/1999 at 2:44 a.m.
In Response To: Re: A question about GURPS Myth (David Wellington)
Oh, one other thing (this one's for everybody): if Connacht is still the emperor when Muirthemne gets sacked, who's Ceiscoran? And since Balor and Connacht are the same guy, how did he get away with sacking his own capital with nobody noticing he just conveniently cleared out the day before? Is this a Batman/Bruce Wayne--well, maybe Jekyll/Hyde--thing, or is something going on here? Maybe they just called Connacht the Emperor out of respect for his place in history, and he'd been dead for centuries, waiting to be reincarnated... or maybe the Jmen knew the truth all along and that's why they renounced their armor, unable to keep their oath of fealty to a man who had clearly gone bad.
My head hurts...
Messages In This Thread
For your own future enjoyment, please report any major forum abusers or cgi errors so we can remedy the problem. If you have any questions email us.
| The Asylum |
|
|
