: What is it that makes your logic, and your beliefs, that
: much clearer?
: There is no evidince that I know of... (Treat this as
: underlined) ---------
: ...that would suggest that Bahl'al is the only one to
: have done so, and that he can -not- be the Watcher.
: That is what you need to prove to me, since you're set on
: saying that we cann't prove he -is-, but you must be
: able to explain to me (and everyone else here who
: cares) why your belief is the correct one. Is there
: any evidince that rules out a relationship?
Ooooh... you know I'm amazed I never thought of that, what with all this talk of logic... my favorite principle of logic.
You cannot prove a negative.
For those who don't know formal logic, say I write a number on a piece of paper and set it in front of you. You can easily prove, by observation, what that number is. Say it's 5. Now, I take the paper away, you close your eyes, and I write '7' on another paper and put it in front of you. Prove to your neighbor that I did not write 5.
...where do you even begin? "Well, I didn't see a 5, so it's obviously not 5!" (this is the same fallacy which makes atheism as much a matter of faith as any theist belief - you can't prove God doesn't exist any more than you can prove anything else doesn't).
This is the big fallacy of Loki's argument that Bahl'al is the only one to ever make Thrall. That they never say explicitly that anyone other than Bahl'al makes Thrall is not proof that Bahl'al alone makes them (not even considering the fact that they never even state that Bahl'al even makes them, or what the Dream of Unlife even does for that matter).
