: Looking at the Si'anwon flavour text again, the words
: "dream of unlife" are lower case. This could
: imply that it is not a dream borne from the One Dream
: but rather a secret that would benefit an undead
: being. Perhaps knowledge of possession of this could
: restore a resurrected creature's body to its original
: state, thus eliminating the problem of rotting flesh
: hanging from one's body that plagues thrall and
: myrmidons. Bah'lal could be a resurrected general who
: had been able to survive underwater as a glorified
: thrall and through his discovery of the secret, was
: able to restore his body and gain his status as an
: ancient evil. This would imply that he only used the
: power he unearthed in the depths of the sunken city on
: himself.
: However, we also see "dream duel" so this
: argument could be ratified. I just thought this
: interpretation might shed a different light on the
: whole Bahl'al debate even though it provides no
: evidence to indicate the The Watcher is Bahl'al, hence
: the new topic.
Though annoyingly allot of Myth I plot stuff was unset, namingly dreams and the cycle. As i recall originally the Dreams were a name for any spell in patricular, not just the 49, the lower case of the dream of unlife may spurn from this time and they may have forgotten to Capitalise it.
-zeph
