: Perhaps the Avatara are too disciplined to fall prey to
: the Leveller's temptations.
: I'm assuming that Tierceus (Spelling?), who ushered in
: the Age of Reason, and who then was corrupted into the
: next Leveller was a mage (wizard,sorcerer...), but I
: could be wrong. Otherwise Gholsbane's theory is sound
: to my sight and judgement.
Whoa... I wouldn't have even recognized the name had it not been for context and your "(Spelling?)" comment.... "Tireces," I believe, is the correct form.
At any rate, I wouldn't think that just because one is an Avatara, it would make a difference whether they could fall to the Leveller; besides, I don't believe the Leveller "tempts" it's "victims," merely goes in and directly changes them. After all, Connacht would have had to have been pretty disciplined, too (the whole "warrior-discipline stuf), and he obviously was totally against the idea of him as Leveller. Also, Alric will become the next Leveller, if the cycle remains unbroken, and he's an Avatara... Just because it's never happened before, doesn't mean it can't happen, especially when we only know about four levellers (well, three, really): the first, unknown leveller whom Tireces fought; Tireces himself, as Moagim and Moagim Reborn (unless you believe that Mjarin was the leveller, which most of us, I think, don't); and Balor. Three, or four, is NOT a good sampling size, if you've ever taken statistics.
: Seraph
Doom.
