 |
Re: Maul-Oghre relationship (spoiler)
Posted By: Martel (dialup.212-140-64-53.tesco.net)
Date: 11/13/2001 at 2:47 p.m.
In Response To: Re: Maul-Oghre relationship (spoiler) (halforc)
Personally, I'd imagine that Mauls are a distinct subspecie of Oghre that lived in the more inaccessable regions of the Blind Steppes. Plus, from the screenshots, Oghres look more than a bit bigger than Mauls, and, while recognisably boarlike, the Oghres seem far less like terrestrial boars than Mauls do. My guess is that, just as we look considerably less monkey-like than, say, homo-habilis, so Oghres look considerably less boar-like than Mauls. In short, Oghres were simply a more highly evolved form of Maul, and, considering that the Mauls seem to have just about mastered clubs by Myth III, it seems highly possible that the Trow didn't consider the primitive Mauls any threat to them back in the Wind Age. And let's face it, what kind of Maul is eloquent enough to call someone a race of consorts?
Messages In This Thread
For your own future enjoyment, please report any major forum abusers or cgi errors so we can remedy the problem. If you have any questions email us.
| The Asylum |
 |
|