: Thanks lank, that's what I wanted to hear, good thoughts
: and answers for questions that I did all my life. Now
: I see that who are americans. That's terrible, but I
: didn't understand what USA will do now? 3dr World War?
that only if it comes to it. i trust that there are actually enough sensible people in american parliament to restrain from a war if they possibly can.
: With whom? Afganistan? Palestinian? If they know that
: it was terrorist act, they must catch, kill or i don't
: know what make with them, but not make war with this
: country. I think that ppl are innocent, they don't
: send these planes there. Terrorist did it, and I think
: that are hidding in others countries now. So, why make
: a new war to kill millions of innocent ppl that didn't
: make it? Terrorists must pay it, not innocent ppl, i
: think. What will do americans now?
islam has plenty in it to justify killing innocents, simply because it's such an extremely xenophobic religion.
if it goes to all out war, then innocents will surely die. if it remains a terrorist vs intelligence war, then hopefully, civilian casualties can be minimised. justice has to be had, if not for political reasons, then for the innocents who actually suffered and suffer still.
: Than I have some question about tragedy. How could 2
: planes destroy 2 bildings? I mean why americans war
: planes didn't hit them? Was they slipping or what? How
: could 2 planes get to city center too easy? Where were
: airforces? That i can't understand.
in general, hijackings are not about mad suicide crashes into big buildings. they didn't suspect a thing until the first collision. even then, it was mainly thought to be accidental (i don't know how many people knew that it was actually hijacked at that time). until the second one, that is.
by that stage, it was too late, perhaps, to suspect or track the third plane, let alone shoot it down ([sardonism]they were looking elsewhere, for some odd reason[/sardonism]).
the fact that there were so many hijackings in so little time is where they slipped. however; honestly, there was no real reason to suspect security would need to be so much tighter (by virtue of the dubious fact that if it hasn't happened in the past, it won't happen now or in the future).
: Ah, and thanks for respect lank. I didn't want say
: something bad about americans, I knew they are great
: ppl(ppl that I met in USA).
the point is still in your favour that the coverage is only so big because it's america that got hit, but i really think that such an academic thought should be left until the furor and emotion has died down quite signifigantly, and even then handled with great tact and careful compassion.
regarding this post: http://carnage.bungie.org/myth/asylum/asylum.forum.pl?read=13254
try taking a less reactionary and prejudiced stance. i was tempted to flame in response to that (i lost a lot of respect, due to that), but what good would it do? it certainly wouldn't help you learn anything. archer is obviously touched by this, perhaps more deeply than i am (quite probably so), and your intolerant and highly generalised and basically prejudiced comments throughout this thread would be most hurtful. i don't know if archer (amongst others) will respect you again or forgive you for what you've said, but i hope you understand why so.
: Thanks for answers, if anybody will answer.
take care,
lank
