 |
Resolved! :-)
Posted By: Archer »–)› (198.139.4.192)
Date: 6/4/2001 at 1:36 a.m.
In Response To: Re: Guess What I'm Sick Of (Lord Raven)
Your post completely resolves everything. It was very gracious of you. :-) And thank you for the compliment on my timeline.
: You spelt ridiculous wrong, probably a typo. :) I don't
: recall ever 'flaming' you, I just pointed out that
: during my time here you've been involved in two
: disputes with Forrest, although I do acknowledge that
: both were resolved.
Agreed.
: I do apologize if my post caused you any distress, you
: caught me at a bad time and I took it out on you. I've
: never had a beef with you, and I was originally
: interested in your subsite. It was just reading
: through your posts, I got the impression you were just
: looking for an argument.
: I don't remember claiming that Forrest invented the
: Encyclopedia, but if I remember rightly, he wasn't
: 100% happy with you taking the same thing he did and
: compacting it. Haven't heard anything about it in a
: while, suppose he doesn't mind anymore.
: Granted. That was my bad. I re-read your old post about
: Delusions, you didn't badmouth it, just questioned its
: organization.
: Good.
: I still think pre-release takes priority over third party
: plugs and is probably only superceded by GURPS, the
: games themselves and maybe the manuals. Even the Myth
: Comic would rank higher than third party plugs.
: Agreed.
: I haven't read GURPS in its entirety, as I recall you
: hadn't until a few weeks back. I'm sure if I had read
: it all, I could be of more use here. Even if it does
: have problems, Bungie (no matter how drunk), still
: sanctioned it.
: I assume Gene Seabolt wrote GURPS Myth, as I hear quite a
: bit about him. But if he did put it in GURPS Myth, it
: was with the OK of Bungie.
I assume that MJ's word will soon be taken over the hollow shell that is Bungie :-) very soon.
: Not really. I've been absent for about a year, busy with
: school commitments. Granted, you probably know Forrest
: better than me.
: As I said, I never intended for my post to degenerate
: into a flame. I was angry and it probably got out out
: of hand.
: If this is so, I am sorry. I don't read EVERY post in the
: Asylum, so I may be guilty of assumption. I just read
: further up and noticed that a lot of people were
: jumping to his aid, not just me.
: I enjoyed reading over your timeline, it was one of the
: few non myth.bungie.org things I have found useful. I
: never posted comments, but I commend your efforts. I
: never insulted your work in any way, I just said that
: Forrest's was some of the best.
Agreed and thanks.
: Hopefully I've covered everything, I am usually guilty of
: sarcasm in my posts, so I won't delve into that
: quagmire. I apologize once again for any personal
: attacks in my post, but not for the intent. I am sick
: of people who come here and undermine Forrest's work,
: even if Archer is not responsible for it. I was in a
: bad mood (how many times is that now?) but I recognise
: my post bordered on a flame, and I withdraw those
: comments. All better Archer?
All better! :-P
»–)›
Messages In This Thread
For your own future enjoyment, please report any major forum abusers or cgi errors so we can remedy the problem. If you have any questions email us.
| The Asylum |
|
|
