HBOHBO Forum
glyphstrip  
Halo.bungie.org
glyphstrip
Frequently Asked Forum Questions
 Search the HBO News Archives

Any All Exact 
Search the Halo Updates DBs

BWU Halo Halo2 
Search Older Posts on This Forum:
Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts

View Thread Reply Return to Index Set Prefs Previous Next
Re: Supercarriers are BIG and maybe not real
By:Stretchy
Date: 10/14/16 12:21 am
In Response To: Re: Supercarriers are BIG and maybe not real (davidfuchs)

: It's certainly an interesting question, in-universe as well as the lengths
: people dislike Reach's changes and want to reconcile them :P

: The COS does seem to run up against the size issue of sci-fi that plagues
: things like the Death Star, in that they don't seem possible, let alone
: feasible. The Long Night of Solace is essentially the volume of 148
: already-massive CAS assault carriers, and unlike the Infinity I don't see
: where one giant ship would actually be more effective at the covenant's
: mission than that many smaller ships (and unlike the Long Night of Solace
: the Infinity is basically only larger than most large UNSC ships by a
: factor of three to five.)

: Then there's the question of how you marshall the resources to build
: something like this. The amount of resources involved in making a super
: carrier is essentially that of strip-mining entire moons. But even if you
: get the thing built, how are you going to staff it and fuel it? A
: Nimitz-class aircraft carrier costs around 8.5 billion dollars, and it
: costs roughly a quarter of that cost to substantially refurbish one,
: including refueling its nuclear reactor. I can only imagine when we get
: into ships of that size, especially ones that are designed to be a nucleus
: of the entire fleet, that costs skyrocket vastly, and I don't think
: Engineers could solve that problem. We see in the post-Covenant world that
: it's difficult for anything other than larger Covenant splinter factions
: to be able to field a CAS, which makes me wonder how the Covenant could
: have run it even at full strength, let alone multiples of them.

As Vagueness said it's so big it's silly, and completely impractical.


Messages In This Thread

Supercarriers are BIG and maybe not realStretchy10/13/16 8:31 pm
     Re: Supercarriers are BIG and maybe not realdavidfuchs10/13/16 9:17 pm
           Re: Supercarriers are BIG and maybe not realStretchy10/14/16 12:21 am
                 Re: Supercarriers are BIG and maybe not realGrizzlei10/14/16 12:33 am
                       Re: Supercarriers are BIG and maybe not realQuirel10/14/16 2:24 am
                             It's motherships all the way down! *NM*Tuckerscreator10/14/16 4:02 am
                             Re: Supercarriers are BIG and maybe not realGrizzlei10/14/16 10:54 am
                                   I like brutterscotch *NM*PyroSporker1610/21/16 9:44 pm
                                         broo! scared you. *NM*thebruce010/24/16 11:21 am
     HRINC v2.Gravemind10/14/16 10:10 am
     Re: Supercarriers are BIG and maybe not realStephen L. (SoundEffect)10/15/16 1:02 pm

Sign up to post.

You will only be able to post to the forum if you first create a user profile.
If, however, you already have a user profile, please follow the "Set Preferences" link on the main index page and enter your user name to log in to post.