Re: The art of speculation
Posted By: Forrest (cache1.avtel.net)
Date: 5/31/1999 at 5:05 p.m.
In Response To: The art of speculation (Tino)
: If we're going to take everything so literally and
: disregard speculation, then what's the point of this
: forum? After all, Bungie once said Myth II would have
: a more "Marathon like" storyline. Whether
: this was true or not could be debated, but Marathon
: had a ton of story that wasn't there in plain sight.
: Did any of it contradict what was actually said in the
: open? Forrest, help me out here.
On rare occasion yes, one piece did contradict another. But it was usually consistant. And yes, the majority of Marathon's story is constructed from bits and pieces of info from all three games, loosely tied together into a beautifull weave. However, we can't just ignore what the game says, unless it's stated as heresay or just a theory of some character. And given that it is stated that Balor *is* the Leveler, and Soulblighter *is not* the Leveler - instead of just "Balors seems to be the Leveler and Soulblighter not" - we should take that at face value.
Messages In This Thread
For your own future enjoyment, please report any major forum abusers or cgi errors so we can remedy the problem. If you have any questions email us.