 |
hey Archer!
Posted By: Welly (pool-141-153-215-11.mad.east.verizon.net)
Date: 9/5/2003 at 8:52 p.m.
In Response To: Re: Canon revisited (Superfoborg)
Ahh okay, I wasn't including the difference between whole sources and individual facts. Your reply to my other post clears that up. In that case your proposal for defining canon is perfect.
Next: we have to see what Archer thinks of it. If he agrees, we've reached a milestone.
Messages In This Thread
- Canon revisited
Superfoborg (ip68-6-118-241.sb.sd.cox.net) -- 9/2/2003 at 8:39 p.m.
- Re: Canon revisited *PIC*
~zeph~ (194.125.156.68) -- 9/2/2003 at 10:36 p.m.
- Re: Canon revisited
Welly (pool-141-153-190-175.mad.east.verizon.net) -- 9/3/2003 at 5:38 p.m.
- Re: Canon revisited
Gholsbane (m9-mp1.cvx2-a.bir.dial.ntli.net) -- 9/3/2003 at 6:12 p.m.
- Re: Canon revisited
Superfoborg (ip68-6-118-241.sb.sd.cox.net) -- 9/4/2003 at 1:25 a.m.
- hey Archer!
Welly (pool-141-153-215-11.mad.east.verizon.net) -- 9/5/2003 at 8:52 p.m.
For your own future enjoyment, please report any major forum abusers or cgi errors so we can remedy the problem. If you have any questions email us.
| The Asylum |
 |
|