: [....]
: I'm a bit confused... how can Category 2 be the same
: stuff as the type-b info of Category 1?
: It looks like pseudocanon is being called canon while at
: the same time being classified as another category
: altogether.
: I'm glad this stuff is finally getting verified and
: cleared up. The only thing I personally would change
: is to remove the type-b passage of Category 1 so
: pseudocanon would not be cross-categorized. The rest
: of it is perfect.
I think he meant that it classifies as 1B if it is both 2A and 2B. 2 is an either/or category.
