Re: Myth TFL, Myth II, Myth III Errata!
Posted By: Ghôlsbane (188.8.131.52)
Date: 11/5/2002 at 9:31 p.m.
In Response To: Re: Myth TFL, Myth II, Myth III Errata! (Olorin)
: Really, I don't understand your abhorrance of M3.
: Granted, you can say "In M3 it says x y and z,
: but imo...", but don't say "Everything is M3
: = liez."
Please don't misquote me Olorin, I have only stated my opinion in this thread: "I think this was a bad idea...", "...I and many others have chosen to disregard Myth 3...". Effectively, that's as good an "imo" as you'll get.
: After all, Chimera's canon, and Bungie
: didn't do that.
I've never played Chimera and I guess I missed the part where everyone agreed that it was canon. In my opinion, it is not.
: It doesn't contradict anything, and of course it was
: going to destroy some theories, if it didn't answer
: historical questions it would have been pointless.
If they wanted to keep the attraction of Myth, MJ should have at least opened up as many mysteries as they had revealed since that was the charm of Bungie's games.
: There's till plenty left to debate and some new
: mysteries (as you may have notriced by some of my
: psots), so why can't you accept it, even if only as an
: "Alternate Tru7h".
I can accept that it is MJ's interpretation, but never as the Tru7h since that pertains to Bungie by definition.
Messages In This Thread
For your own future enjoyment, please report any major forum abusers or cgi errors so we can remedy the problem. If you have any questions email us.