: Know what else doesn’t? HBO. That’s good, and then sometimes that’s bad.
: Here, we’re gonna’ talk about one of those bad things, and that’s the fact
: that the site hasn’t changed as far as I can tell for more than a decade.
: The last major stylesheet updates as far as I can tell come from 2002.
: Probably the most substantial change to the homepage in as long as I've
: lurked has been Claude taking pity on us mobile users and adding an extra
: space to avoid accidental button mashing (which I believe we owe to Levi,
: who knows when.) There's a lot of useful stuff that's mostly historical at
: this point, meaning that it drowns out the actually regularly-used stuff.

: But it's 2016! And have you looked at the page source for the front page?
: It's tables, man!

: And then we get to the forum page. At this point, our "arcane" and
: "hard to understand" forum setup seems like as fundamental as
: breathing, but that doesn't mean it couldn't use a facelift. It's still
: advertising Halo 2. As an Xbox exclusive. Coming soon.

: So my question is—what's the feasibility of giving (at least the front page
: and/or forums) an overhaul?

: Since I hadn't dug into HTML and CSS in any major way for years, I took a
: stab at a sample of what a pretty minimal update might look like. You can
: see a live demo on my web site (note that it's a straight rip of the front
: page, so navigating away from the page will take you to live stuff on the
: site now.)

: http://davidhfuchs.com/hbo/hbo_redesign_v1.4.html

: Nothing drastic is going on here—it's still pretty much the exact same color
: scheme—but the site goes from being just 650px wide to supporting multiple
: display widths, with a top-level navigation that would send a lot of old
: Halo 1 and Halo 2 stuff to the "Archive" heading, and on small
: screen sizes degrades down to a mobile-friendly stacked display. None of
: the images have really changed, although if things were getting updated it
: would probably be a good idea to throw in code for @2x retina display
: sizes for the old logo and misc. integral graphics. None of the CSS and
: HTML is validated either, so there's possibly some wonky stuff, so that's
: my caveat. All this stuff should work with IE7 and up, and certainly look
: fine on any modern browsers and going forward.

I wouldn't be opposed to archiving the whole forum and setting up something different (like DBO or whatever). As for the front page, that would probably be a Wu question. I'd love to see your look or something similar (a call back to the original yet updated for the times), but who knows how that would affect news entry and the old links that spiderweb everywhere across the internet!

- MacGyver10