Let's refresh:
"Here I thought that thing about most people not reading the fine print would've stopped being true years ago."

That sarcasm was quite overtly directed at my post, as if I somehow erred and "missed" that information -- when that information was irrelevant to my post. Here's another way you could have said the same thing, and perhaps sparked some interesting conversation rather than this OT reply thread...

"Hey, there's fine print on that image that says the release date for Halo is 2014, in case anyone missed it. The stuff at the bottom says: (etc)"

Different tone. Different subject. Different result.

: No, I meant to reply to that post because that was the first time I've seen
: that image and there was only one thread about it.

See above.