Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
: But, wtf? You'll believe a negative rumour with zero substantiation, but a
: neutral counter-rumour takes some kind of official proof to convince
: you?
Said negative rumor* is (IMHO) much more believable than this "neutral counter-rumour." I believe that Microsoft is a stupid company that makes increasingly stupid decisions. To say that I wouldn't put this past them is a massive understatement. In all honestly, I'm surprised they haven't tried something stupid like this before! It's a matter of when, not if, as far as I'm concerned.
Perhaps we're cynical... but this is Microsoft we're talking about.
New Xbox will NOT be "always on" | iForge | 5/6/13 10:07 pm |
Re: New Xbox will NOT be "always on" | Gravemind | 5/6/13 11:06 pm |
Re: New Xbox will NOT be "always on" | Azo 'Galvat | 5/7/13 3:20 am |
Re: New Xbox will NOT be "always on" | RC Master | 5/7/13 7:23 am |
Re: New Xbox will NOT be "always on" | davidfuchs | 5/7/13 8:32 am |
Re: New Xbox will NOT be "always on" | Pkmnrulz240 | 5/7/13 9:09 am |
Re: New Xbox will NOT be "always on" | Pkmnrulz240 | 5/7/13 9:10 am |
Re: New Xbox will NOT be "always on" | Azo 'Galvat | 5/7/13 11:50 am |
This. *NM* | Hyokin | 5/7/13 1:14 pm |