Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: TFoR Redo? | |
Posted By: Leviathan <levihoffmeier@gmail.com> | Date: 1/14/11 1:02 a.m. |
In Response To: TFoR Redo? (Riceatron) : Now, for the canon, it wouldn't THROW OUT things, but it would replace and : expand. We have had the issue with the number of S-II's in the field since : Legends and Cole Protocol, but why not fix that? : Just re-do TFoR and make it mesh more, and by doing that, make it better. Halsey's journal helps explain the issues with the number of Spartan- IIs. Personally, I'd rather have a as-minimal-as-possible-under-the-supervision-of-Mr.-Nylund-revised Fall of Reach. I really enjoy reading that book, and have read it multiple times over the years. Also, my girlfriend randomly decided to read it and REALLY liked it. That MEANS something. We should not mess with such divine signs.
|
|
Replies: |
TFoR Redo? | Riceatron | 1/13/11 11:46 p.m. |
Re: TFoR Redo? | Leviathan | 1/14/11 1:02 a.m. |
Re: TFoR Redo? | Mid7night | 1/14/11 10:50 a.m. |
Re: TFoR Redo? | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 1/14/11 11:09 a.m. |
Re: TFoR Redo? | Riceatron | 1/15/11 4:15 a.m. |
Re: TFoR Redo? | Ynation913 | 1/14/11 1:16 p.m. |
Re: TFoR Redo? | Quirel | 1/14/11 8:42 p.m. |
Heh. Console RPG should be RTS *NM* | Quirel | 1/15/11 7:39 a.m. |
Re: TFoR Redo? | Document | 1/16/11 12:44 a.m. |
Re: TFoR Redo? | Quirel | 1/16/11 1:21 a.m. |
Confusion cleared. *NM* | Document | 1/16/11 3:29 a.m. |
Re: TFoR Redo? | Andrew Nagy | 1/16/11 3:46 a.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |