Remaking Halo 1 - Again, no thanks | Avateur | 11/30/10 1:21 p.m. |
THANK YOU! *NM* | hyokin | 11/30/10 1:28 p.m. |
Completely Agree! *NM* | terminator182 | 11/30/10 1:31 p.m. |
Re: Remaking Halo 1 - Again, no thanks | padraig08 | 11/30/10 1:38 p.m. |
Re: Remaking Halo 1 - Again, no thanks | General Vagueness | 12/5/10 1:18 a.m. |
Re: Remaking Halo 1 - Again, no thanks | Mazz | 11/30/10 1:42 p.m. |
I'm all for it! | Myyke | 11/30/10 2:14 p.m. |
Re: I'm all for it! | Pkmnrulz240 | 11/30/10 2:27 p.m. |
I do like the sound of those ideas there | ProjectD13X | 11/30/10 3:48 p.m. |
Re: I do like the sound of those ideas there | ZackDark | 11/30/10 5:11 p.m. |
Re: Remaking Halo 1 - Again, no thanks | Leo | 11/30/10 2:31 p.m. |
a good game is a good game | kidtsunami | 11/30/10 2:50 p.m. |
Re: a good game is a good game | Caleb 117 | 11/30/10 3:02 p.m. |
Sentiment echo'd *NM* | thebruce0 | 11/30/10 3:04 p.m. |
Re: Remaking Halo 1 - Again, no thanks | DocOctavius | 11/30/10 3:07 p.m. |
Re: Remaking Halo 1 - Again, no thanks | kidtsunami | 11/30/10 5:01 p.m. |
Re: Oh my. | ZackDark | 11/30/10 5:15 p.m. |
Whats the problem?? | Suircata | 11/30/10 4:25 p.m. |
Re: Whats the problem?? | ThorsHammer | 11/30/10 4:53 p.m. |
They'd need to be extremely faithful... | RyanTheHeretic | 11/30/10 5:13 p.m. |
Re: They'd need to be extremely faithful... | ArteenEsben | 11/30/10 5:36 p.m. |
Re: They'd need to be extremely faithful... | RyanTheHeretic | 11/30/10 6:38 p.m. |
Re: They'd need to be extremely faithful... | ArteenEsben | 11/30/10 8:09 p.m. |
Re: They'd need to be extremely faithful... | Leisandir | 12/1/10 7:52 a.m. |
or we could all just set our expectations lower | Hawaiian Pig | 12/1/10 1:55 a.m. |
Re: or we could all just set our expectations lowe | Avateur | 12/1/10 2:46 a.m. |
I was shaking w/excitement when I read this again *NM* | Cardo 8 ATL | 11/30/10 5:18 p.m. |
Yes, yes, yes, 100 times yes. | Gravemind | 12/1/10 2:39 a.m. |
Re: Yes, yes, yes, 100 times yes. | RC Master | 12/1/10 12:32 p.m. |
Re: Yes, yes, yes, 100 times yes. | RyanTheHeretic | 12/1/10 2:34 p.m. |
Re: Yes, yes, yes, 100 times yes. | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 12/1/10 2:41 p.m. |
Re: Yes, yes, yes, 100 times yes. | RyanTheHeretic | 12/2/10 4:09 a.m. |
Re: Yes, yes, yes, 100 times yes. | Bry | 12/2/10 5:25 a.m. |
Re: Yes, yes, yes, 100 times yes. | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 12/2/10 6:54 a.m. |
Re: Yes, yes, yes, 100 times yes. | Bry | 12/2/10 9:13 a.m. |
Re: Yes, yes, yes, 100 times yes. | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 12/2/10 11:33 a.m. |
Re: Yes, yes, yes, 100 times yes. | Bry | 12/2/10 12:38 p.m. |
Re: Yes, yes, yes, 100 times yes. | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 12/2/10 1:25 p.m. |
Stephen, if you would be so kind... | JDQuackers | 12/2/10 3:41 p.m. |
Agreed with the request. *NM* | ZackDark | 12/2/10 4:55 p.m. |
Re: Stephen, if you would be so kind... | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 12/2/10 8:07 p.m. |
Re: Stephen, if you would be so kind... | SonofMacPhisto | 12/2/10 8:17 p.m. |
Asthetically mostly OK, but Geographically? | The Loot | 12/2/10 9:23 p.m. |
Re: Asthetically mostly OK, but Geographically? | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 12/2/10 10:21 p.m. |
Re: Asthetically mostly OK, but Geographically? | Quirel | 12/2/10 10:26 p.m. |
Re: Asthetically mostly OK, but Geographically? | ZackDark | 12/3/10 8:58 a.m. |
Re: Asthetically mostly OK, but Geographically? | Bry | 12/3/10 9:53 a.m. |
Re: Asthetically mostly OK, but Geographically? | Wayward Spleen™ | 12/3/10 10:03 a.m. |
Re: Asthetically mostly OK, but Geographically? | ZackDark | 12/3/10 10:30 a.m. |
Re: Asthetically mostly OK, but Geographically? | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 12/3/10 11:07 a.m. |
Re: Asthetically mostly OK, but Geographically? | Wayward Spleen™ | 12/3/10 11:20 a.m. |
Tugs change everything | scarab | 12/3/10 11:55 a.m. |
Re: Tugs change everything | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 12/3/10 3:27 p.m. |
Re: Tugs change everything | bluerunner | 12/3/10 3:49 p.m. |
Re: Tugs change everything | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 12/3/10 4:08 p.m. |
Re: Tugs change everything | Bry | 12/3/10 4:27 p.m. |
Get your kleenex box... | bluerunner | 12/3/10 4:53 p.m. |
Re: Get your kleenex box... | Bry | 12/3/10 5:34 p.m. |
Re: Get your kleenex box... | Quirel | 12/3/10 9:23 p.m. |
Found the Ultimate Answer | The Loot | 12/4/10 4:58 a.m. |
Re: Found the Ultimate Answer | Quirel | 12/4/10 11:36 p.m. |
Re: Get your kleenex box... | Bry | 12/4/10 12:18 p.m. |
I. Like. This. *NM* | thebruce0 | 12/6/10 9:31 a.m. |
Re: Asthetically mostly OK, but Geographically? | Bry | 12/3/10 12:47 p.m. |
Re: Asthetically mostly OK, but Geographically? | Quirel | 12/3/10 9:23 p.m. |
Re: Asthetically mostly OK, but Geographically? | Bry | 12/4/10 12:12 p.m. |
Re: Asthetically mostly OK, but Geographically? | Quirel | 12/4/10 11:55 p.m. |
Re: Asthetically mostly OK, but Geographically? | Bry | 12/5/10 12:51 a.m. |
Re: Asthetically mostly OK, but Geographically? | Quirel | 12/5/10 1:45 p.m. |
Re: Yes, yes, yes, 100 times yes. | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 12/2/10 6:59 a.m. |
Re: Yes, yes, yes, 100 times yes. | Quirel | 12/1/10 6:37 p.m. |
Because. | Gravemind | 12/2/10 1:35 a.m. |
Add online play, I'll buy. *NM* | Kermit | 12/1/10 8:17 p.m. |
feasible online play... I'll explain | Cardo 8 ATL | 12/1/10 10:18 p.m. |
When it comes down to it... | Wayward Spleen™ | 12/2/10 9:57 a.m. |